01 / PLANNING CONDITION
Prepare the required details
Review the condition and approved scheme. Identify the method statement, protection drawing and supporting information needed for the proposed submission.
Compare the documents →Tree protection · Construction & conditions
Arboricultural Method Statements and Tree Protection Plans that connect the approved design with practical site arrangements.
ACP helps project teams define how retained trees will be protected through the relevant works. Bring together the method, drawing, sequence and responsibilities before contractors need to act on them.
Make the requirement clear
A planning condition, construction tender or design change can each trigger the need for more detail. Send the exact request and the relevant drawings so the scope addresses the correct stage.
01 / PLANNING CONDITION
Review the condition and approved scheme. Identify the method statement, protection drawing and supporting information needed for the proposed submission.
Compare the documents →02 / CONSTRUCTION PREPARATION
Translate the assessed design into agreed working areas, protection measures and a sequence the project team can understand.
Review the technical scope →03 / CHANGE ON SITE
Consider a proposed route, compound or method change against the tree evidence and approved details. Define any revised documents or approvals needed.
See the control points →Two connected documents
An Arboricultural Method Statement and Tree Protection Plan should work together. Each needs consistent tree references, drawing revisions and assumptions about the works.
| Document / input | Its purpose | What needs coordination |
|---|---|---|
| Arboricultural Method Statement — AMS | Explain the relevant sequence, working methods and arrangements for protecting retained trees. | The construction method, responsibilities, supervision points and procedure for changes. |
| Tree Protection Plan — TPP | Show the relevant protection measures and their relationship to the works. | Retained trees, protection lines, working areas, access and any specified ground protection. |
| Survey and impact assessment | Provide the tree baseline and the assessed development effects. | Consistent tree references, retained or removed trees and the design that has been assessed. |
| Contractor and design information | Explain how the development will actually be carried out. | The programme, plant, access, construction space, engineering details and site responsibilities. |
Address the real work
Generic wording cannot resolve a constrained site. We identify the relevant interfaces and the construction information needed to develop usable arboricultural details.
Coordinate the proposed barrier alignment with the retained trees, working area and access route. Identify the relevant specification and who is responsible for installation and checks.
Where the position changes between phases, the drawing and method need to show how that change is controlled.
Define where the proposed activity needs further protection detail. Obtain the relevant ground, loading and construction information before specifying the arrangement.
A generic mat or board description is not enough to establish suitability for every use.
Review the specific operations close to retained trees. Coordinate the method with engineering and contractor information, including access and temporary works.
Identify any investigation, specialist supervision or approval needed before the relevant operation proceeds.
Agree practical locations for storage, spoil and other temporary activity. Make protected areas and restrictions clear to those managing the site.
The method should address how the team will maintain the arrangements through changing work stages.
A sequence people can follow
The method should identify the right checkpoints for the actual works. We agree what happens, who is involved and what evidence will record the stage.
Responsibilities that are easy to follow
The documents should identify interfaces rather than leave the contractor to infer them. Agree the technical responsibilities and the authority or project procedures that apply.
| Coordination point | What the project team should have clear |
|---|---|
| Document control | Which drawing and method revisions are current, and how revised information reaches the site team. |
| Installation and routine checks | Who carries out the relevant tasks, who checks them and where the records are kept. |
| Specialist involvement | Which activities require arboricultural attendance, engineering input or another agreed review. |
| Changes or unexpected conditions | Who is notified, what needs review and how the relevant work is held or adjusted pending a decision. |
| Final records | Which inspection, supervision or completion information is included in the agreed scope. |
Clear documents and a defined handover
We set out the document preparation, drawings and site support in the quotation. The level of detail follows the assessed impacts, condition and construction requirements.
Fees & readiness
The fee depends on the tree constraints, the work interfaces and the detail already available. We distinguish preparation of documents from ongoing site attendance.
England · your site and authority
Discuss projects in Greater London, the South East, East of England and the Midlands, or elsewhere in England. Share the site postcode and council request so we can confirm the scope, survey arrangements and availability.
We identify the planning authority and review its actual request. A county name does not establish which documents or conditions apply to a site.
Bring the architect’s layout, engineering information and relevant ecology work together. Agree the assessment boundaries, access and responsibilities before commissioning.
Before you commission
Send the condition, current drawings and any existing tree documents. We can then identify the package and project inputs needed.
It sets out the relevant working methods, sequence and responsibilities for protecting retained trees through development. It should reflect the actual site and proposed operations.
It is the drawing that shows the relevant protection measures in relation to the trees and works. It should agree with the method statement and current construction arrangement.
The authority’s requirement and the works determine the package. They are often coordinated because the drawing and written methods answer related questions. We confirm the deliverables in the quotation.
We can prepare the agreed arboricultural information and supporting response for a condition submission. The authority decides whether the condition is discharged, and any approval timing must be observed.
The consultancy scope concerns assessment, documents and any agreed site support. Installation and construction are separately defined contractor responsibilities unless expressly included.
Only where specified. We can define relevant attendance, inspection points and reporting in the quotation so the project team knows what support has been commissioned.
Refer the proposed change for review against the current tree protection and assessed design. Update the documents and obtain any required agreement before relying on the revised arrangement.
We can review it against the current condition, design and intended methods. The quotation can then identify the revisions, further information or site checks needed.
Let’s define the right scope
Start with your email and a short project outline. We will clarify the information needed and prepare a site-specific quotation.
Your site, proposed works and the tree information requested.
A consultant can request the current layout, tree reports and council comments.
Understand the deliverables, programme and any additional work.
Request an arboricultural quotation
Your enquiry goes to ACP Consultants. See our privacy policy.
Sources checked on 27 October 2026. BSI lists BS 5837:2012 as current and under review. Local authority examples illustrate the document types; the actual authority’s current requirements must be checked for your site.