BNG Planning Validation Checklists | Biodiversity Net Gain
The BNG planning validation checklist now sits at the heart of planning in England. Most developments must show, at validation, how they will deliver at least a 10% biodiversity net gain.
That means presenting a transparent baseline in biodiversity units, explaining the route to net gain, and setting out how habitats will be managed for 30 years. This guide walks through the BNG submission checklist, clarifies planning requirements BNG, and explains exemptions, the statutory BNG planning condition, and where to find official templates. It follows the Environment Act 2021 framework, the statutory biodiversity unit metric, and good practice around habitat distinctiveness, condition, and strategic significance.
- Our Biodiversity Net Gain (BNG) Services in England:
- BNG baseline habitat surveys (Metric 4.0 compliant)
- Biodiversity unit calculations & deficit analysis
- Habitat creation, enhancement & on-site mitigation design
- Biodiversity Gain Plans (BGP) for planning submission
- Off-site BNG strategy & unit sourcing advice
- Habitat Management & Monitoring Plans (HMMP)
- Pre-application BNG feasibility & risk reviews
- Planning condition discharge & post-consent support
From Start to Finish, Your Project’s in Good Hands
We follow a simple, transparent process to ensure your project runs smoothly from the very first contact to the final report. Our approach is designed to provide you with clarity at every step, so you’re fully informed and confident in moving forward.
01
Step 1: Request a Quote
Fill out our quick quote form or call us, and our team will provide a free, no-obligation quote, outlining the services tailored to your needs.
02
Step 2: Confirm Your Booking
Once you approve the quote, simply return the booking form. We’ll schedule your survey and ensure all the details are taken care of.
03
Step 3: Receive Your Report
After your survey is completed and payment is received, we’ll promptly issue your survey report, ensuring you get the results as quickly as possible.
Trusted by 200+ Companies & Clients
In the past year, we’ve delivered over 750+ audit-ready reports supporting 400+ projects for developers, planners, and architects nationwide. We put quality over quantity and build lasting relationships based on trust, ensuring your planning applications are backed by robust evidence and delivered on time.
What is the BNG Planning Validation Checklist?
Think of the BNG planning validation checklist as the ecological gatekeeper for your application. It confirms whether BNG applies, demonstrates the pre-development biodiversity value using the statutory biodiversity unit metric. It shows how at least +10% will be achieved through on-site creation or enhancement, off-site biodiversity units, or (as a last resort) statutory credits. Planning officers use it to decide if an application can be registered; if core BNG items are missing, LPA validation BNG will fail. Treat the checklist like a quality assurance tool that aligns local validation expectations with national policy.
Core Contents of a Strong BNG Submission Checklist
A well-made BNG submission checklist reads as a concise narrative rather than a document dump. Begin with an applicability statement that makes clear whether BNG rules apply and, if not, which exemption is claimed. Move directly into the baseline: state the total pre-development biodiversity units, the survey date, the metric version, and include maps that depict habitat parcels accurately. If any habitat change has occurred since January 2020, explain it and provide the pre-degradation baseline. Confirm the presence or absence of irreplaceable habitats and make clear that such habitats sit outside the metric.
Next, describe the route to net gain. If the uplift is to be achieved on-site, outline which habitats are being retained, enhanced, or created, with target conditions and realistic time-to-target. Also, if you need off-site units, indicate the anticipated scale, broad location, and legal mechanism. If credits are likely, say so and explain why. Close this section by naming the documents you are submitting: the completed biodiversity metric files, an existing-habitat plan, a proposed-habitat plan (if available), and a short management outline for the 30-year period. This narrative approach meets planning requirements BNG without overwhelming the case officer.
Who Prepares a BNG Planning Validation Checklist?
A BNG planning validation checklist is usually prepared by a multidisciplinary project team. Ecologists typically lead habitat surveys, biodiversity metric calculations and Biodiversity Gain Plans. Planning consultants often coordinate submission requirements and ensure supporting documents align with local validation expectations. Landscape architects may contribute habitat enhancement proposals, planting strategies and long-term management measures.
Developers remain responsible for ensuring that all required information accompanies the planning application. This commonly includes habitat maps, biodiversity metric calculations, existing and proposed habitat plans, Biodiversity Gain Plans and Habitat Monitoring and Management Plans. Where off-site biodiversity units form part of the strategy, additional legal and registration information may also be required.
Early collaboration between ecologists, planning consultants, landscape architects and project teams often improves submission quality. This integrated approach helps identify biodiversity opportunities at an early stage. It also reduces validation delays and minimises the risk of missing information. Well-prepared submissions allow planning officers to review proposals efficiently and assess Biodiversity Net Gain requirements with confidence.
Compliance Note: Environment Act 2021 and Natural England Guidance
All local planning authorities must demonstrate that their procedures align with the statutory framework established under the Environment Act 2021. The Act formally embeds Biodiversity Net Gain within the English planning system. Part 6, Chapter 1 establishes the requirement for a minimum 10% biodiversity uplift. The uplift must be secured and maintained for at least 30 years.
The Biodiversity Gain (Planning and Reporting) Regulations 2024 provide further implementation guidance. These regulations define what must be submitted, recorded and monitored. They also make use of the statutory biodiversity metric mandatory. In addition, they introduce national reporting requirements for local planning authorities.
Authorities should also apply Natural England guidance, including template JP058 for Habitat Monitoring and Management Plans. This template standardises how long-term habitat management should be described and evidenced. Professional guidance from CIEEM, CIRIA and IEMA further supports good practice. Together, these documents help ensure BNG procedures remain technically robust and legally defensible.
For local authorities, compliance extends beyond administrative requirements. It also demonstrates effective governance and due diligence. By embedding these frameworks within validation, approval and enforcement processes, councils can demonstrate compliance with statutory expectations. This approach also helps decisions withstand scrutiny from inspectors, auditors and potential appeals.
Understanding the Statutory Biodiversity Unit Metric
The statutory biodiversity metric translates habitats into units using distinctiveness, condition, area or length, and strategic significance. To satisfy BNG planning validation requirements, clearly explain how you mapped the baseline. Describe how you assessed habitat condition using published criteria. Demonstrate how you applied the habitat, hedgerow and river modules where relevant.
You should also explain the post-development scenario clearly. Identify which habitats the scheme will retain, enhance or create. Explain why target condition assumptions and delivery timescales remain realistic. Demonstrate how long-term management measures will support the proposed outcomes. Where you claim strategic significance, link proposals to local conservation priorities. Relevant examples include green infrastructure networks, wildlife corridors and Local Nature Recovery Strategies.
The objective is straightforward but requires robust evidence. Present a transparent calculation that demonstrates at least a 10% biodiversity uplift. Apply the calculation across all relevant metric modules. Provide supporting evidence that can withstand detailed scrutiny during local planning authority validation.
How to Evidence Planning Requirements BNG at Submission
Meeting planning requirements for BNG is easier when ecology leads design from the outset. Start with avoidance and minimisation measures wherever possible. Demonstrate that high-value habitats are retained where feasible. Use habitat enhancement and creation measures to deliver the required uplift.
Document the baseline using dated surveys, photographs and GIS outputs. Present drawings with legends that match the habitat categories used within the metric. If off-site units form part of the strategy, explain the rationale clearly. Identify the intended legal mechanism and confirm that registration requirements will be satisfied.
Conclude with a summary of the 30-year biodiversity management approach. Identify management responsibilities, monitoring intervals and success indicators. This creates a clear BNG submission checklist for decision-makers. The result is a coherent planning document rather than a collection of disconnected files.
BNG Planning Validation Checklist Template
Where a council publishes a BNG planning validation checklist template, use it to frame your submission so officers can tick items quickly. Where no template exists, mirror the national headings and include a one-page contents list of BNG artefacts, filenames, drawing numbers, and metric versions. This simple editorial step often determines whether LPA validation BNG succeeds first time.
BNG Planning Validation Checklist PDF
Teams work better from a single source of truth. A BNG planning validation checklist PDF that collates the applicability statement, baseline narrative, metric summary, delivery route, and management outline backed by appendices for maps and spreadsheets keeps architects, landscape designers, and ecologists aligned. Version control matters: keep dates and metric versions consistent across every reference.
BNG Planning Validation Checklist GOV UK Guidance
National guidance anchors the BNG planning validation checklist GOV UK position: BNG is a condition of permission; most applications since 2024 must address it; and a Biodiversity Gain Plan must be approved before works begin. Reflect this in your narrative by stating the metric version used, confirming the headline percentage uplift, and being explicit about any reliance on off-site units or credits.
BNG Exemptions
Not every proposal is required to produce BNG assessment. BNG exemptions include householder projects, truly de minimis habitat losses with no priority habitat, qualifying self-build or custom-build housing, projects whose main purpose is to create habitat as a gain site, certain nationally significant schemes, urgent Crown development, and permitted development. If you rely on an exemption, say so, quantify it (for example, <25 m² habitat loss), and provide the evidence. If not exempt, the full BNG planning validation checklist applies.
BNG Planning Condition
The general biodiversity gain condition prevents development from commencing until the Biodiversity Gain Plan receives approval. Your validation package should clearly acknowledge this sequence. Submit the planning application with the required checklist items. Once permission is granted, submit the full Biodiversity Gain Plan. Discharge the condition before commencing works. This timetable demonstrates that delivery remains practical and achievable. It also shows that the project will meet Biodiversity Net Gain planning requirements.
BNG Regulations and the Environment Act 2021
Mandatory net gain stems from BNG regulations under the Environment Act 2021. In your submission, connect the proposals to that statutory basis, the current biodiversity unit metric, and any local drivers such as nature recovery strategies. Framing habitats as part of sustainable development, natural capital accounting, and environmental impact mitigation helps decision-makers weigh benefits alongside constraints.
On-Site, off-Site, and Credits: Choosing the Delivery Route
In narrative form, set out your hierarchy. On-site measures come first: designing in species-rich grassland, native scrub and woodland, ponds, green roofs, and enhancements to retained habitats. If space or context limits on-site uplift, explain the move to off-site biodiversity units, noting geographical relevance and legal security. Only then consider statutory credits and explain why they are necessary. By writing this section as a short story of design evolution rather than a list, the BNG submission checklist reads as a reasoned strategy, not a fallback stitched together at the last minute.
Need Support Meeting BNG Validation Requirements?
From pre-application screening to Biodiversity Gain Plan preparation and post-validation queries, our ecologists support compliant BNG submissions that meet local planning authority checklist requirements across England.
Mapping and Evidence Standards
Validation depends on traceability. Describe your GIS approach, including how you digitised baseline polygons and lengths. State which coordinate system you used. Explain how mapped areas and lengths align with the metric outputs. Summarise habitat condition assessments and include representative photographs. Outline the biodiversity management schedule that will move habitats towards their target condition. Explain how management actions will maintain those conditions over time. Where off-site units form part of the strategy, identify the legal mechanism that will secure the obligations. This evidence forms the foundation of successful LPA BNG validation.
Typical Pitfalls that Cause Invalidation
Most failures are avoidable. Out-of-date biodiversity unit metric versions, undated surveys, polygons that do not match the spreadsheet, and ambitious target conditions unsupported by management detail are common. So too are omissions: forgetting hedgerow or river modules, asserting strategic significance without conservation planning evidence, or hiding reliance on off-site units or credits. A one-page internal quality check before submission can save weeks.
Integrating BNG with Design and EIA
Where an Ecological Impact Assessment is required, align mitigation with net gain. Start with avoidance and minimisation, then layer on nature-based solutions that double as amenity and green infrastructure wildflower verges that guide people as well as pollinators, shade trees that cool streets and lift habitat condition, connected planting that strengthens wildlife corridors. The same logic reduces management burden over 30 years and advances environmental sustainability outcomes.
Costing, Phasing, and Risk
BNG is a design, finance, and stewardship commitment. Set out capital works for soil preparation, planting, water features and fencing; then the operational budget for inspections, adaptive management, and reporting across the 30-year period of land stewardship. Acknowledge risks drought, establishment failure, invasive species and pair each with a simple contingency. When this sits alongside the BNG planning validation checklist, officers can see not just intent but deliverability.
Small Sites and Simplified Approaches
On uncomplicated minor schemes, the Small Sites Metric can streamline calculation. The discipline is the same: state the baseline clearly, propose realistic habitat enhancement, schedule the management, and show the uplift. Even a short BNG submission checklist benefit from the same clarity and traceability as a major application.
Example Structure for a Submission Bundle
A clean structure helps validation. Begin with a one-page BNG planning validation checklist summary. Follow with the baseline narrative and maps, then the metric files and proposed habitats plan. Add a short section on delivery route on-site first, off-site units where needed, and credits only as a last resort then a concise 30-year monitoring and management outline. Append species lists, ecological metrics forms, and photo plates for completeness. This sequence consistently meets planning requirements BNG and shortens the time to validation.
Frequently Asked Validation Clarifications (and how to pre-empt them)
Address the usual queries before they arise. Give both the baseline date and the survey date, resolve metric warnings and annotate assumptions, cite local strategies when claiming strategic significance, and remember hedgerow and river modules where applicable. Name the responsible party for long-term biodiversity management and state reporting intervals. Anticipation turns the BNG planning validation checklist into a smooth administrative step.
Related Biodiversity Net Gain Guidance
The BNG planning validation checklist forms only one part of the wider Biodiversity Net Gain process. Developers often need supporting guidance on biodiversity unit calculations, Biodiversity Gain Plans, Habitat Monitoring and Management Plans and off-site biodiversity units. Understanding how these documents interact can help reduce validation delays and improve planning outcomes.
Related guidance may include Biodiversity Net Gain surveys, statutory biodiversity metric calculations, Biodiversity Gain Plans, Habitat Monitoring and Management Plans, Biodiversity Gain Site Register requirements, off-site biodiversity units, biodiversity unit calculations, BNG exemptions and Biodiversity Net Gain costs. Additional resources on planning permission requirements, habitat enhancement measures and long-term ecological management can also support a successful submission.
Reviewing these topics alongside the validation checklist helps ensure applications remain complete, compliant and aligned with current Biodiversity Net Gain legislation. It also provides a clearer understanding of how baseline assessments, habitat enhancement proposals and long-term management commitments contribute to achieving measurable biodiversity improvement.
Common Reasons BNG Planning Applications Fail Validation
Most BNG validation failures result from missing information rather than complex ecological issues. Local planning authorities frequently reject submissions where biodiversity metric files are absent, habitat maps do not match the metric outputs, or survey information is incomplete. Outdated metric versions, missing habitat condition assessments and unsupported target conditions can also delay validation.
Applications may also fail where Biodiversity Gain Plans lack sufficient detail. Common issues include unclear habitat enhancement proposals, missing management responsibilities and unrealistic delivery timescales. Where off-site biodiversity units are proposed, authorities often expect evidence of legal delivery mechanisms and registration arrangements.
Strategic significance claims should be supported by appropriate evidence. References to Local Nature Recovery Strategies, green infrastructure plans and ecological networks help demonstrate how proposals contribute to wider biodiversity objectives. Hedgerow and river modules should also be included where relevant.
A final quality assurance review before submission can significantly reduce validation risk. Cross-checking habitat maps, metric calculations, management plans and supporting documents helps ensure consistency throughout the application. This approach improves validation outcomes and reduces the likelihood of avoidable planning delays.
Typical BNG Validation Workflow
Most Biodiversity Net Gain submissions follow a similar sequence. The process usually begins with a habitat survey and baseline assessment. This establishes existing biodiversity value and identifies any ecological constraints. The statutory biodiversity metric is then used to calculate baseline biodiversity units.
Design teams can then explore habitat retention, enhancement and creation opportunities. Proposed habitats are mapped and entered into the metric to calculate post-development biodiversity units. Where on-site delivery cannot achieve the required uplift, off-site biodiversity units or statutory credits may be considered.
Once the biodiversity strategy is agreed, supporting documents are prepared. These commonly include habitat plans, metric calculations, Biodiversity Gain Plans and Habitat Monitoring and Management Plans. Additional evidence may be required where off-site biodiversity units form part of the delivery strategy.
The completed BNG planning validation checklist is submitted alongside the planning application. Following planning approval, the Biodiversity Gain Plan must usually be approved before development can commence. Long-term habitat monitoring and management then ensure biodiversity gains remain effective throughout the required management period.
References and Useful Resources
The following references and guidance documents provide technical, policy and planning context for Biodiversity Net Gain (BNG) planning validation checklists in England. These resources include national legislation, statutory biodiversity metric guidance, Biodiversity Gain Plan requirements, Habitat Monitoring and Management Plan templates and local validation guidance used by planning authorities. Together, they support biodiversity metric calculations, planning validation submissions, habitat management proposals and long-term biodiversity compliance under the Environment Act 2021.
National Biodiversity Net Gain Guidance
- DEFRA – Understanding Biodiversity Net Gain
- DEFRA – Biodiversity Metric: Calculate the Biodiversity Net Gain of a Project or Development
- DEFRA – Biodiversity Gain Plan Template and Guidance
- Natural England – Habitat Management and Monitoring Plan Template (JP058)
- Planning Portal – Biodiversity Net Gain Guidance
- UK Government – Biodiversity Gain Requirements (Exemptions) Regulations 2024
- CIEEM – Biodiversity Net Gain Good Practice Principles
- CIRIA – Biodiversity Net Gain Good Practice Guidance
- IEMA – Biodiversity Net Gain Resources
Planning Validation and Submission Resources
- Planning Portal – Local Validation Lists
- DEFRA – Biodiversity Gain Plan Guidance
- Natural England – Small Sites Metric Guidance
- Natural England – Statutory Biodiversity Metric User Guide
- UK Government – Biodiversity Gain Site Register Guidance
- Natural England – Biodiversity Gain Site Register Guidance
- DEFRA – Biodiversity Gain Plan Decision Notice Requirements
- UK Government – Environment Act 2021 (Biodiversity Gain Provisions)
Biodiversity Metric and Habitat Assessment Resources
- DEFRA – Statutory Biodiversity Metric Calculation Tool
- DEFRA – Statutory Biodiversity Metric User Guide
- UK Habitat Classification (UKHab) Guidance
- CIEEM – Habitat Condition Assessment Guidance
- Natural England – Habitat Distinctiveness and Strategic Significance Guidance
Habitat Management and Monitoring Resources
- Natural England – Habitat Monitoring and Management Plan (HMMP) Template
- Natural England – Habitat Creation and Restoration Guidance
- CIEEM – Biodiversity Monitoring and Reporting Guidance
- CIRIA – Long-Term Habitat Management Good Practice
Planning and Environmental Assessment Resources
- Planning Practice Guidance – Biodiversity Net Gain
- Planning Practice Guidance – Environmental Impact Assessment
- Planning Portal – Ecology and Biodiversity Planning Guidance
- DEFRA – Local Nature Recovery Strategy Guidance
- Natural England – Green Infrastructure Framework
Professional Guidance and Best Practice
Our Core Values – Built on TRUST
Frequently Asked Questions
The BNG planning validation checklist can be complex, especially for applicants new to biodiversity net gain (BNG) and planning policy. This FAQ section addresses common questions about the planning validation checklist for biodiversity net gain, offering practical guidance on submission formats, validation expectations, exemptions, and next steps after approval. It also explains how checklists relate to the Environment Act 2021, the BNG submission checklist template, and wider topics such as ecological restoration and nature-based solutions in development.
What is the difference between a BNG planning validation checklist and a BNG submission checklist template?
The BNG planning validation checklist is a mandatory list of information required by the Local Planning Authority (LPA) before your planning application can be validated. It ensures that you have included key documents such as the biodiversity metric, habitat maps, and the baseline assessment.
A BNG submission checklist template, on the other hand, is a structured format (often a table or editable PDF) used by applicants to confirm that each validation requirement has been met. Some LPAs provide downloadable templates; others expect applicants to create one referencing the national biodiversity net gain guidance.
How do I prepare a planning validation checklist for biodiversity net gain?
To prepare a compliant planning validation checklist for biodiversity net gain, start with the statutory requirements under the Environment Act 2021. Include:
- the biodiversity unit metric spreadsheet (latest statutory version).
- an applicability or exemption statement.
- baseline and proposed habitat maps.
- details of any irreplaceable habitats.
- a short narrative showing how a 10% uplift is achieved; and
- an outline of 30-year biodiversity management.
Using a BNG submission checklist template as your cover sheet helps officers quickly confirm that all documentation is present.
Can small developers use a simplified BNG submission checklist template?
Yes. For minor developments that qualify under the Small Sites Metric, LPAs often accept a simplified BNG submission checklist template. It typically lists fewer documents baseline plan, metric, and brief management outline but the principles remain identical. You still need to show how your project achieves biodiversity net gain and meets the planning requirements BNG for validation.
How is ecological restoration linked to the BNG planning validation checklist?
Ecological restoration is central to biodiversity net gain. When completing the BNG planning validation checklist, you must describe how degraded or low-value habitats will be restored or enhanced. For example, restoring poor semi-improved grassland into species-rich grassland increases biodiversity units in the biodiversity metric and strengthens your BNG score. By referencing restoration actions, you show compliance with both the Environment Act 2021 and LPA validation BNG expectations.
What documents should accompany the BNG submission checklist template?
Attach all key supporting documents in a logical order:
- The BNG submission checklist template itself signed and dated.
- The completed biodiversity unit metric spreadsheet (Metric 4.0 or later).
- Baseline and proposed habitat maps clearly labelled.
- The habitat quality assessment sheets and photographs.
- Any off-site unit or credit evidence.
- A short report summarising the planning requirements BNG and confirming 30-year stewardship.
This bundle ensures a valid and traceable submission for LPA validation BNG.
Is there a national BNG planning validation checklist PDF on GOV.UK?
Currently, there is no single national BNG planning validation checklist PDF, but GOV.UK publishes official guidance that LPAs use to shape their own checklists. Many councils (e.g., Lichfield, Maldon, Reading) host downloadable PDFs reflecting national BNG validation requirements. If your authority has not yet published one, you can adapt these models to your project, ensuring alignment with the statutory BNG regulations.
What happens after my planning validation checklist for biodiversity net gain is accepted?
Once your BNG planning validation checklist passes review, your application proceeds to determination. If permission is granted, it will include the BNG planning condition a legal requirement that prevents development from starting until the Biodiversity Gain Plan is approved. That plan expands on your initial submission, detailing delivery methods, monitoring, and 30-year management, ensuring genuine biodiversity net gain is achieved and maintained.
How does the checklist relate to broader sustainability goals?
Completing the BNG planning validation checklist contributes directly to sustainable development and environmental sustainability objectives. It aligns development with nature-based solutions, green infrastructure, and natural capital accounting, ensuring that growth supports rather than degrades the natural environment. By following the checklist, applicants actively participate in national ecological restoration and land stewardship goals across England.
What are common mistakes in the BNG planning validation checklist?
Typical errors include missing metric files, outdated baseline data, or failure to declare off-site units. Others forget to provide habitat enhancement or long-term management detail. Checking against your BNG submission checklist template before submission prevents invalidation and keeps the planning process smooth.
Where can I find further guidance on biodiversity net gain validation?
You can find up-to-date national guidance on GOV.UK under “Biodiversity Net Gain”, as well as resources from Natural England, CIEEM, and the Planning Portal. These outline how to complete your BNG planning validation checklist, interpret the biodiversity unit metric, and align with BNG regulations introduced under the Environment Act 2021.
Does every planning application require a BNG planning validation checklist?
No. Some developments may qualify for exemptions under Biodiversity Net Gain legislation. Examples can include certain householder applications, qualifying self-build projects and developments involving very small habitat losses. Applicants should always confirm exemption status before relying on it.
What happens if my BNG planning validation checklist is incomplete?
An incomplete checklist may prevent validation of the planning application. Missing metric calculations, habitat plans or supporting evidence can result in requests for further information. This may delay determination and increase project timescales.
Can a planning application be approved without a Biodiversity Gain Plan?
Yes. In most cases, the Biodiversity Gain Plan is approved after planning permission has been granted. However, the biodiversity gain condition normally prevents development from commencing until the Biodiversity Gain Plan has been approved.
Testimonials
Trusted by Clients Across the UK – Consistently Rated 5-Stars for Professionalism and Expertise
![]()
Denise SkinnerTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Excellent![]()
Pump House Designs Battle OfficeTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Very efficient and professional service provided on one of our local projects![]()
James LukerTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I found ACP to be both cost effective and and very professional in the emergence survey that they recently undertook for me. I would highly recommend their services![]()
Danai TsiouriTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I recently worked with ACP Consultants for a bat emergence survey and was thoroughly impressed with their service. They were highly responsive, efficient, and delivered the work quickly without compromising on quality. The team was professional throughout and clearly knowledgeable in their field. Beyond bat surveys, they offer a wide range of ecological and other consultancy services, and I’m looking forward to working with them again in the future. Highly recommended!![]()
Manahil KhanTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
ACP has been great to work with—efficient, friendly, and professional. Megan was especially helpful and made sure we met all our requirements smoothly. Really appreciated the support!![]()
Zayn SaleemiTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
We recently used ACP for an air quality assessment and were extremely impressed with the service. Megan was professional, knowledgeable, and incredibly helpful throughout the entire process. She made everything straightforward and was always on hand to answer any questions we had. The report was thorough and delivered promptly. Highly recommended – would definitely work with them again.![]()
Katie CTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
David and Megan from ACP were so helpful in assisting us with a PEA. We needed an ecological report to submit to the council and they are also helping us with a PRA. They have been so quick with everything and helped us understand it all.![]()
Paul HuntTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I was asked by the council to provide a biodiversity net gain assessment to support my planning application for a small extension to my house. ACP helped provide a statement to explain that the development was below the threshold and therefore exempt, saving me time and money! Highly recommend.![]()
Kayleigh DixonTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
ACP provided an air quality assessment to support my planning application. They were extremely helpful and managed to undertake it with a short turn around in order to meet a tight deadline with the council!![]()
Keith SpouncerTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I had a PEA done earlier this year. Fast delivery and easy to work with. I would definitely recommend!
Need Support Meeting BNG Validation Requirements?
From pre-application screening to Biodiversity Gain Plan preparation and post-validation queries, our ecologists support compliant BNG submissions that meet local planning authority checklist requirements across England.
- Last Updated:
- September 2026
Disclaimer: Our content is prepared by ACP Consultants’ in-house specialists and is based on current guidance, standards, and best practice in environmental consultancy. While we make every effort to keep information accurate and up to date, it is provided for general guidance only and should not be relied upon as a substitute for professional advice on specific projects. Planning authorities retain final decision-making powers, and requirements may vary between local authorities and over time. ACP Consultants accepts no liability for any loss arising from reliance on this content without obtaining tailored advice for your project.