1. Establish the site and planning authority
Confirm the red-line boundary, application type and date. Check whether the site is within a National Park, is affected by local designations or has a relevant neighbourhood plan.
Hampshire BNG / County planning guidance
Biodiversity net gain in Hampshire starts with your site boundary, habitat baseline and planning authority. Use this guide to identify the right council, explore the nature recovery map and prepare the evidence your application needs.
ACP helps developers, architects, planners and landowners assess habitats, calculate biodiversity units and plan delivery. We connect the site evidence with local policy, National Park requirements and the wider ecology constraints.
Reviewed 7 November 2026 · Hampshire LNRS published 8 December 2025
10% statutory objective / habitat evidence / metric methods
For developments in scope, the statutory objective is to increase biodiversity value by at least 10% against the existing onsite habitat baseline. An ecologist identifies habitats, measures their condition and calculates the baseline. They use the statutory biodiversity metric or, where eligibility rules allow, the Small Sites Metric.
The result is not simply a percentage of the land set aside for nature. Habitat area, distinctiveness, condition, strategic significance and the proposed habitat changes all matter. Area, hedgerow and watercourse units are accounted for separately. Where a smaller non-exempt scheme qualifies, our Small Sites Metric assessments explain the simplified calculation route.
A useful BNG design starts early. Retaining mature trees and habitats can reduce the units at risk, while well-placed habitat enhancement can support both landscape quality and wider nature recovery. Therefore, habitat assessment should inform a scheme before its layout becomes fixed.
For a fuller explanation of the assessment process, see ACP's BNG assessment and UKHab baseline survey and statutory biodiversity metric service.
The current statutory metric release is version 1.1.0, updated on 3 November 2026. Use the appropriate current tool and guidance for the application.
11 districts / two unitary cities / two National Parks
Hampshire is not a single local planning authority. Most ordinary development applications go to one of the district or borough councils, or to Southampton or Portsmouth City Council. Within the National Parks, their separate planning policies and decision-making arrangements apply. Hampshire County Council deals with minerals, waste and certain county development applications.
The table identifies the relevant geography. Always check the exact site address and planning boundary, particularly near National Park boundaries.
| Planning area | Usually responsible for ordinary planning applications | Important distinction |
|---|---|---|
| Basingstoke and Deane | Basingstoke and Deane Borough Council | Adopted Local Plan 2011–2029; higher BNG policy proposals remain emerging |
| East Hampshire | East Hampshire District Council outside the National Park | Within the South Downs, the National Park's planning policy applies |
| Eastleigh | Eastleigh Borough Council | South Hampshire/Solent ecological constraints may also affect proposals |
| Fareham | Fareham Borough Council | Fareham Local Plan 2037 and the separate Welborne plan area need checking |
| Gosport | Gosport Borough Council | Emerging Local Plan 2042 is not an adopted replacement |
| Hart | Hart District Council | Thames Basin Heaths SPA considerations can arise independently of BNG |
| Havant | Havant Borough Council | Adopted Core Strategy and Allocations Plan; replacement plan is emerging |
| New Forest district | New Forest District Council outside the National Park | National Park land is a different planning-policy area |
| Rushmoor | Rushmoor Borough Council | Thames Basin Heaths SPA constraints can require separate mitigation |
| Test Valley | Test Valley Borough Council, subject to National Park boundaries | New Forest and Solent effects depend on the specific site |
| Winchester | Winchester City Council outside South Downs National Park | The Local Plan 2020–2040 was adopted in March 2026; within the park, South Downs policy governs |
| Planning area | Usually responsible for ordinary planning applications | Important distinction |
|---|---|---|
| Southampton | Southampton City Council | Its adopted plan framework remains in force; City Vision Local Plan is emerging |
| Portsmouth | Portsmouth City Council | Portsmouth Plan 2012 remains adopted while the new Local Plan is under examination |
| New Forest National Park | New Forest National Park Authority | Adopted National Park Local Plan 2016–2036 and its own local requirements |
| South Downs National Park (Hampshire portion) | South Downs National Park Authority as planning authority | Some councils determine applications on its behalf; South Downs Local Plan policy SD9 applies |
A district's name does not always tell you which plan applies. In parts of Winchester, East Hampshire and other districts, the South Downs National Park is the planning authority even if a district handles application administration under an agreement. Likewise, the New Forest National Park has its own adopted plan.
Use the Hampshire planning authority directory and the South Downs planning responsibility guide for boundary-sensitive cases.
Published December 2025 / mapped habitat priorities
Hampshire's Local Nature Recovery Strategy (LNRS) was published on 8 December 2025. It covers the Hampshire strategy area, including Southampton, Portsmouth and the Hampshire portions of the New Forest and South Downs National Parks. The Isle of Wight has its own LNRS.
Its Local Habitat Map helps users find where nature is already important and where restoration may deliver wider benefits. It includes:
For qualifying habitat measures, mapped strategic significance can influence the biodiversity metric. However, being inside an opportunity area does not automatically qualify every habitat proposal for an uplift. The proposed habitat, action and mapping must match the latest metric guidance.
The map is a starting point, not a substitute for a UKHab survey, habitat condition assessment, protected species evidence or a council's planning constraints check. Equally, an LNRS opportunity area is not by itself a new statutory nature conservation designation.
Hampshire includes chalk grassland and chalk streams, heathland, ancient woodland, coastal wetlands, saltmarsh and urban green infrastructure. The particular survey and design considerations depend on what is present at the site, not on a county-wide assumption.
For example, habitat connectivity may be relevant around the South Downs; heathland and ancient woodland may be important around the New Forest; and coastal or intertidal habitats require particular care around the Solent. Urban projects in Southampton and Portsmouth may also present opportunities for habitat creation on smaller or fragmented sites.
Ecology surveys should identify the actual vegetation, habitats, constraints and feasible enhancement locations. Sensitive habitats and irreplaceable habitats require separate treatment: they cannot simply be treated as interchangeable units.
Read the published Hampshire LNRS and explore the Local Habitat Map.
Application date / red-line area / habitat impacts
The date of the planning application is important. For new applications made on or after 6 August 2026, qualifying development on a red-line site of 0.2 hectares or less is exempt if it does not adversely impact an onsite priority habitat.
Other exemptions can apply, including householder applications and the de minimis rule where the development does not affect onsite priority habitat and impacts less than 25 m² of onsite habitat and less than 5 metres of linear habitat. A new exemption also applies to certain wholly temporary developments permitted for no more than five years, subject to specific conditions.
The former general exemption for qualifying self-build and custom-build applications was removed for new applications from 6 August 2026. Saved earlier applications and some section 73 cases require separate transitional checks. Do not assume that a self-build project is exempt solely because it is self-build.
Six practical routes / evidence for your project
Use this guide to identify the evidence to check. Site and application details determine the correct outcome.
| Your situation | First check | Likely next evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Householder extension | Is the application legally a householder application? | BNG exemption statement where applicable; protected species and trees may still need assessment |
| New application on a site of 0.2 ha or less (from 6 August 2026) | Red-line area, onsite priority habitat and application date | Record the legal exemption basis and supporting plan; do not presume absence of ecological duties |
| Small non-exempt development | Exemption tests, habitat loss and Small Sites Metric eligibility | UKHab/baseline information, appropriate metric, mitigation and gain route |
| Major development | Existing habitats, design alternatives and relevant local policies | Competent ecological baseline, statutory metric, design options, long-term delivery strategy |
| Site within or near a designated area | Protected area, likely effect, National Park policies and species records | Ecological assessment, screening/Habitats Regulations evidence and mitigation as necessary, in addition to BNG |
| Site considering off-site units | Habitat trading, metric geography, gain site registration and allocation | Off-site unit evidence, legal security, allocation and Biodiversity Gain Plan |
Important: A statutory BNG exemption is not an exemption from protected species law, the Habitats Regulations, planning policy or other ecological survey requirements.
For detailed exemption examples, use ACP's BNG exemptions guide.
Six planning steps / baseline through to delivery
Confirm the red-line boundary, application type and date. Check whether the site is within a National Park, is affected by local designations or has a relevant neighbourhood plan.
Record the exemption or transitional position with evidence. Where BNG applies, the national validation information generally includes the applicant's BNG statement, pre-development value, metric calculation, habitat plan and relevant information about degradation and irreplaceable habitats.
Record UKHab habitat types, habitat condition, hedgerows and watercourses where relevant. Review suitable ecological records, designated sites and protected species constraints. For some schemes, additional field surveys may be needed.
Consider avoidance first, then changes that retain or improve habitats. Test realistic habitat creation and enhancement proposals. Also verify distinct habitat trading rules; a headline 10% gain is not sufficient if the metric's individual requirements are not met.
Each authority may have its own validation list and requirements for ecology reports, Habitats Regulations Assessment, tree information, nutrient mitigation, species surveys or supporting plans. These requirements are not identical across Hampshire.
For an in-scope permission, the Biodiversity Gain Plan must normally be approved before development starts. Significant onsite gains and registered off-site gains generally require legally secured habitat management for at least 30 years. Start discussions about agreements, monitoring and responsibility early.
For related specialist work, see ACP's Biodiversity Gain Plan service and Habitat Management and Monitoring Plans.
Adopted plans / application evidence / national framework
Local planning decisions depend on the applicable development plan and the ecological evidence for the site. These six areas illustrate the different policy routes.
The Winchester District Local Plan 2020–2040 was adopted on 24 March 2026. It replaces the former district plan documents. However, South Downs National Park policies apply to land within the Park.
The adopted 2019 South Downs Local Plan includes SD9, Biodiversity and Geodiversity. Use the Park’s planning policies and application requirements, including where a district council handles administration on its behalf.
The adopted 2019 plan includes SP5 for internationally important nature conservation sites and SP6, The Natural Environment. The Park’s local requirements, published on 1 September 2026, include a biodiversity checklist and relevant ecological surveys.
The adopted Core Strategy framework includes CS22, Biodiversity. Southampton City Vision is an emerging Local Plan. Therefore, use the adopted framework and the city’s application checklist to scope the planning evidence.
The adopted Portsmouth Plan 2012 includes PCS13, A Greener Portsmouth. The replacement Local Plan was submitted for examination on 18 March 2026. Check the city’s validation requirements, with the Biodiversity Gain Plan normally following permission and preceding commencement.
The adopted 2016 Local Plan includes EM4, Biodiversity. A possible higher BNG target is under consideration through plan-making. It does not establish an adopted blanket 20% requirement.
The current NPPF limits higher mandatory BNG targets to justified, deliverable, specific site allocations. Decision-makers should give no weight to other policies requiring gains beyond the statutory framework.
Read NPPF policies N1(2) and N2(3) with the application date, exemptions and relevant plan. Distinguish ecological information requests from requirements to deliver extra biodiversity units.
Eastleigh, Fareham, Gosport, Hart, Havant, Rushmoor, Test Valley, East Hampshire and New Forest District also have separate plans and local lists. Check the actual authority’s application guidance when scoping your submission.
Solent / New Forest / Thames Basin Heaths
A 10% biodiversity calculation does not, by itself, demonstrate that protected sites or species are adequately safeguarded. Different legal tests may apply, including screening and appropriate assessment under the Habitats Regulations.
Around the Solent, nutrient neutrality and recreational disturbance can be material for certain development types and locations. Elsewhere, proposals may affect the New Forest designated habitats, the Thames Basin Heaths SPA, chalk streams, ancient woodland or protected species. The right assessment follows the impact pathway, not a generic county rule.
For example, a housing project may require both a BNG metric and a separate nutrient budget or strategic mitigation contribution. Do not assume that buying BNG units settles nutrient mitigation, SPA recreation impacts or protected species licensing. Some habitat measures may count towards more than one outcome only where the relevant current rules permit it and double counting is avoided.
Early ecological constraints work can reduce costly design changes and missed survey seasons.
On-site / registered off-site / long-term management
The delivery approach should consider the specific application and the current statutory gain hierarchy.
For major development, the hierarchy gives preference to avoiding harm and suitable onsite habitat measures, then registered off-site gains where needed. Statutory credits are the last resort.
For non-major development applications made on or after 6 August 2026, if they are not exempt, onsite enhancement, onsite creation and registered off-site delivery sit at the same priority level under the revised hierarchy. Statutory credits remain the final option. Saved earlier applications and certain section 73 permissions follow transitional arrangements.
Off-site biodiversity units must match habitat trading requirements and the applicable metric calculations. The underlying gain site needs the right legal agreement, management commitments and registration. Its units must also be formally allocated to the development. A proposed or advertised habitat bank is not proof that units are registered, available, suitable or allocated.
A Hampshire location may help with local delivery priorities, but location alone does not guarantee a favourable spatial risk score. Check the metric's relevant geographic tests, particularly for watercourse units and projects spanning catchments.
Read our guide to off-site biodiversity units and search England’s biodiversity gain sites register.
Ten checks / coordinated planning evidence
Ask ACP about your BNG assessment. Share your planning location, proposed works and development stage.
Scope / survey / practical delivery
We can help identify the likely BNG pathway, arrange or assess appropriate habitat surveys, calculate biodiversity units and coordinate evidence with project designers and planning advisers. Where ecological constraints, National Park requirements or off-site delivery affect the proposal, we can outline the additional information needed before assumptions become commitments.
Our advice starts with the actual site and development proposal. We use that information to define the survey, calculation and delivery scope.
You may also find our BNG process guide and BNG consultants service useful.
For the wider regional picture, explore biodiversity net gain in South East England.
Practical answers / application planning
No. The statutory framework generally requires at least 10% BNG for qualifying development in England, but exemptions and transitional arrangements apply. Check the application date, site size, habitat impacts and development type.
For planning applications made on or after 6 August 2026, the new exemption can apply where the red-line site is no larger than 0.2 hectares and the proposal does not impact an onsite priority habitat. Earlier or section 73 applications may be treated differently.
No. The former self-build/custom-build exemption was removed for new applications from 6 August 2026. An application may qualify under a different exemption, but it must meet that exemption's conditions.
Usually the district, borough or city council for the land. However, sites in the New Forest or South Downs National Parks can fall under a different local planning authority. Check the planning boundary before submitting.
The Hampshire LNRS covers its own strategy area, including Portsmouth, Southampton and the Hampshire portions of the National Parks. The Isle of Wight has a separate LNRS, and sites outside Hampshire follow the relevant neighbouring strategy.
No. Mapped potential measures can affect strategic significance where the metric criteria are satisfied, but an ecologist must establish whether the habitat type, proposed action and location qualify.
A BNG assessment establishes the habitat baseline and tests how the proposal can meet the objective. For an in-scope permission, a Biodiversity Gain Plan is the formal document submitted for approval before development starts.
Yes, where the scheme and metric requirements allow. The units must be appropriate, legally secured, registered and allocated. An advertised offer is not evidence of completed allocation.
For qualifying non-major applications made on or after 6 August 2026, the revised gain hierarchy places registered off-site options alongside onsite creation and enhancement. Statutory credits are still the last resort.
No. Separate requirements can arise from effects on protected sites, including nutrients and recreational pressure around parts of the Solent. Their legal tests are distinct from the BNG calculation.
Significant onsite enhancements and registered off-site gains normally need securing and management for at least 30 years. The appropriate legal mechanism, monitoring and responsible party should be considered early.
Send the site location or plan, planning authority if known, development description, drawings, application stage and any existing ecology or habitat information. This helps identify a proportionate scope and the likely next steps.
Talk to ACP / Site enquiries
Tell us where the site is, what you plan to build and how far the application has progressed. We’ll use that context to discuss the surveys, calculations or plans your project needs.
What to have to handA red-line plan, an existing ecology report or a request from the council can help us scope the work. Start with whatever you already have.
Start with the information you have. We ask for your email, site location and enquiry, with a telephone number at the final step.
We use your details to respond to your enquiry. Read our Privacy Policy.
Hampshire BNG
Reviewed 7 November 2026.
Winchester — adopted Local Plan 2020–2040
South Downs — plan-making and adopted policy
New Forest National Park — Local Plan
New Forest National Park — local requirements
Southampton — planning and building control
Portsmouth — adopted Portsmouth Plan
Portsmouth — Local Plan examination
Basingstoke and Deane — planning policy
Havant — BNG submission information